Amicus Curiae
Because Poliner interprets HCQIA's "objectively reasonable test" for peer-reviewer immunity contrary to several other circuits by substituting common law fiat for clearly worded statutory and legislative intent, ought this Court resolve the conflicts?
For the great majority of hospitals who elect Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) accreditation as final federal certification to deem them compliant with MEDICARE Conditions-of-Participation (CoP) and automatically eligible for MEDICARE payments, are JCAHO accreditation standards binding regulations governing patient care and peer-review for clinical privileging?
View the full Amicus Curiae, LAWRENCE R. POLINER, M.D. vs. TEXAS HEALTH SYSTEMS.
Topics
Amicus Curiae
Changes in Healthcare Law
Criminal Defense of Medicare Medicaid Fraud
Disruptive Physicians
Healthcare Attorney and Physician Advocate Jeffrey Grass
Whistleblowers
Recent Updates
March 01, 2010
The specter of the demise of private practice
February 25, 2010
Qui Tam
